In line with the Directive Principles of State Policy enshrined in the Indian Constitution, the government has a constitutional obligation to ensure basic needs – Roti, Kapda aur Makan (Food, Clothes and Shelter) – for the under-privileged. Pursuing this mandate, the district administration proposed clearing a portion of forest land to develop housing for the homeless and economically weaker sections of the society. The proposed land, however, is an ecologically sensitive zone densely populated with age-old trees, medicinal plants and vital biodiversity. Besides, these forests help to regulate micro-climate and rainfalls, provide habitat for wildlife, support soil fertility and prevent land/soil erosion and sustain livelihoods of tribal and nomadic communities. In spite of the ecological and social costs, the administration argues in favour of the said proposal by highlighting that this very initiative addresses fundamental human rights as a critical welfare priority. Besides, it fulfils the government’s duty to uplift & em- power the poor through inclusive housing development. Further, these forest areas have become unsafe due to wild-animal threats and recurring human-wildlife conflicts. Lastly, clearing forest-zones may help to curb anti-social elements allegedly using these areas as hideouts, thereby enhancing law and order. (a) Can deforestation be ethically justified in the pursuit of social welfare objectives like, housing for the homeless? (b) What are the socio-economic, administrative and ethical challenges in balancing environmental conservation with human development? (c) What substantial alternatives or policy interventions can be proposed to ensure that both environmental integrity and human dignity are protected?
This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.
In September 2026, forest officials in Assam successfully rescued and returned a three-month-old tiger cub to the wild after it became entangled in a kitchen garden net in a fringe village. Separated from its mother due to turbulent Brahmaputra river currents during seasonal flooding, the cub's rescue underscores the compounding vulnerabilities faced by apex predators in fragile riverine ecosystems. This event illuminates the delicate balance between rapid institutional rescue mechanisms, veterinary oversight, and community-led vigilance in mitigating human-wildlife friction within critical ecological corridors.
In September 2026, three individuals lost their lives in separate human-elephant conflict incidents across the Sonitpur and Karbi Anglong districts of Assam. Two fatalities occurred in the Dhekiajuli area of Sonitpur, while the third incident took place in a village within Karbi Anglong. These tragic events highlight the escalating pressures of habitat fragmentation, shifting migratory corridors, and the growing vulnerability of rural communities living near forested tracts in Northeast India.
In September 2026, the Tamil Nadu government intensified its commitment to gender-inclusive economic development by scaling up support for women-headed enterprises through the Vetri Magalir Thozhilmunaivor Membattu Thittam. Implemented via the Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation (TIIC), the initiative provides substantial financial backing with loans ranging from ₹10 lakh to ₹5 crore. Designed to address structural barriers in credit access, the scheme seeks to transition women entrepreneurs from micro-ventures to competitive industrial enterprises, bolstering regional manufacturing and inclusive employment.