“In Indian culture and value system, an equal opportunity has been provided irrespective of gender identity. The number of women in public service has been steadily increasing over the years.” Examine the gender specific challenges faced by female public servants and suggest to increase their efficiency in discharging their duties and maintaining high standards of probity.
This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.
The Kerala Public Services Commission has approached the High Court to challenge prosecution sanction orders and criminal cases registered against its members and staff. Stemming from alleged procedural irregularities in the appointment of the Chief of the Industry and Infrastructure Division at the Kerala State Planning Board, this legal challenge brings to the forefront critical questions concerning the statutory immunity, functional autonomy, and accountability mechanisms governing independent constitutional bodies in India. The dispute underscores the delicate legal boundary between executive oversight of administrative appointments and the protection of constitutional functionaries from external coercion.
The Madras High Court has delivered a pivotal interpretation of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), ruling that prior government sanction is not required to prosecute public servants for offenses related to disproportionate assets. The court’s judgment came while refusing to discharge former Minister M.R.K. Panneerselvam from a long-standing corruption case, emphasizing that the accumulation of illicit wealth cannot be equated with the discharge of official duties. This decision reinforces the legal framework for accountability, ensuring that the transition to the new criminal law code does not inadvertently shield public officials from corruption investigations.
The Bombay High Court has delivered a landmark ruling dismissing a plea that argued duty-free shops situated in international departure areas are exempt from domestic laws due to their location beyond standard territorial jurisdiction. The petitioner, linked to Gautam Adani, contended that such transit-zone retail outlets operate outside the regulatory purview of national statutes because they cater to international travelers who have cleared emigration checkpoints. However, the court firmly established that commercial operations physically housed within Indian airports remain fully subject to domestic regulatory frameworks. This decision reinforces the principle that sovereign jurisdiction and statutory compliance cannot be bypassed through spatial arrangements or transit-zone classifications, carrying profound implications for fiscal governance, consumer rights, and corporate accountability in major national infrastructure projects.