“There is a technological company named ABC Incorporated which is the second largest worldwide, situated in the Third World. You are the Executive Officer and the majority shareholder this company,The fast technological improvements have raised worries among environmental activists, regulatory authorities, and the general public over the sustainability of this scenario. You confront substantial issues about the business’s environmental footprint. In 2023, your organization had a significant increase of 48% in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the levels recorded in 2019. The significant rise in energy consumption is mainly due to the surging energy requirements of your data centers, fuelled by the exponential expansion of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Al-powered services need much more computational resources and electrical energy compared to conventional online activities, notwithstanding their notable gains. The technology’s proliferation has led to a growing concern over the environmental repercussions, resulting in an increase in warnings. AI models, especially those used in extensive machine learning and data processing, exhibit much greater energy consumption than conventional computer tasks, with an exponential increase. Although there is already a commitment and goal to achieve net zero emissions by 2030, the challenge of lowering emissions seems overwhelming as the integration of Al continues to increase. To achieve this goal, substantial investments in renewable energy use would be necessary. The difficulty is exacerbated by the competitive environment of the technology sector, where rapid innovation is essential for preserving market standing and shareholders worth. To achieve a balance between innovation, profitability and sustainability, a strategic move is necessary that is in line with both, business objectives and ethical obligations (a) What is your immediate response to the challenges posed in the above case? (b) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the above case. (c) Your company has been identified to be penalized by technological giants. What logical and ethical arguments will you put forth to convince about its necessity? (d) Being a conscience being, what measures would you adopt to maintain balance between Al innovation and environmental footprint?”
This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.
On September 28, 2026, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) provisionally attached assets worth ₹442 crore linked to the online gaming platform RummyCulture under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The probe, rooted in multiple FIRs filed in Telangana, reflects escalating scrutiny into the Indian online real-money gaming sector. Regulatory agencies are increasingly investigating how such platforms, often operating with complex digital payment architectures, are used to facilitate money laundering, tax evasion, and the illegal transfer of funds. This event underscores the challenges of governing a rapidly expanding digital market that sits at the intersection of entertainment, technology, and economic security.
At The Hindu Sustainability Summit panel discussion titled Fossils to Net Zero: Transforming India’s Refinery and Energy Landscape, industry experts deliberated on the critical imperative for the domestic refining sector to simultaneously ensure national energy security and accelerate decarbonisation. The deliberations focused on navigating intensifying geopolitical disruptions affecting crude oil imports, integrating large-scale renewable energy into heavy industrial processes, and operationalising market-based regulatory mechanisms such as the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme to drive green compliance without undermining economic competitiveness.
Prominent artificial intelligence researchers, led by Turing Award laureate Yoshua Bengio, have cautioned against exaggerating apocalyptic and existential risks associated with advanced AI development. Experts argue that shifting public discourse and legislative focus toward speculative dystopian scenarios distracts policymakers from addressing immediate, tangible harms such as algorithmic bias, synthetic disinformation, labor displacement, and socioeconomic inequality.