“A landslide occurred in the middle of the night on 20th July, 2023 in a remote mountain hamlet, approximately 60kilometers from Uttarkashi. The landslide was caused by torrential rains and has resulted in large-scale destruction of property and life. You, as district magistrate of the area, have rushed to the spot with a team of doctors, NGOs, media and police along with numerous support staff to oversee the rescue operations. A man came running to you with a request for urgent medical help for his pregnant wife who is in labor and is losing blood. You directed your medical team to examine his wife. They return and convey to you that this woman needs blood transfusion immediately. Upon enquiry, you come know that a few blood collection bags and blood group test kits are available in the ambulance accompanying your team. Few people of your team have already volunteered to donate blood. Being a physician who has graduated for AIIMS, you know that blood for transfusion needs to be procured only through a recognized blood bank. Your team members are divided on this issue; some favor transfusion while some others oppose it. The doctors in the team are ready to facilitate the delivery provided they are not penalized for transfusion. Now you are in a dilemma. Your professional training emphasizes on prioritizing service to humanity and saving lives of individuals. (a)What are the ethical issues involved in this case? (b) Evaluate the options available to you, being District Magistrate of the area.”
This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.
In September 2026, the Jharkhand Criminal Investigation Department (CID) arrested three candidates—Ajay Kumar, Sanjay Kumar, and Ramakrishna Kumar Singh—as part of an expanding probe into widespread recruitment examination irregularities. This targeted crackdown sheds light on the persistent vulnerabilities plaguing state-level public service recruitment, where organized cheating rings, question paper leaks, and proxy candidates regularly undermine meritocracy. The incident highlights both the proactive measures adopted by state investigative agencies to dismantle recruitment cartels and the deep-seated administrative challenges involved in securing transparent public employment processes across India.
The Supreme Court has launched a rigorous inquiry into the Andhra Pradesh police regarding the failure to produce Sai Krishna before a magistrate, questioning unexplained delays in filing the First Information Report and the inexplicable disappearance of closed-circuit television footage from the Krishnalanka police station in Vijayawada. A three-judge Bench highlighted profound systemic concerns over custodial non-compliance, police accountability, and the safeguarding of personal liberty under Article 21, demanding comprehensive records in a sealed cover while monitoring ongoing proceedings before the High Court.
In September 2026, heavy downpours and low-visibility conditions across Andhra Pradesh's Krishna and NTR districts triggered fatal rain-related accidents, including electrocution and vehicular collisions, prompting emergency police deployment near overflowing rivulets.