This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.
In September 2026, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay announced the 'Thaimaman Thanga Mothiram Thittam', a state-sponsored welfare scheme providing a one-gram gold ring to new mothers. Designed to acknowledge the contribution of mothers and symbolically represent the support of a maternal uncle (Thaimaman), the scheme aims to serve as a catalyst for improving postnatal care, institutional delivery rates, and government-citizen engagement in the public health sector. The initiative continues the state's tradition of utilizing tangible welfare assets to bolster health outcomes while fostering strong grassroots political support.
For sixteen days, dam project oustees in Madhya Pradesh have been engaged in ongoing protests, intensified by severe monsoon-induced waterlogging that has inundated their homes and destroyed essential personal property. This situation reflects a critical failure in the rehabilitation of displaced populations, where project-affected persons (PAPs) have been left in precarious conditions during a peak weather event. The failure to secure timely, safe, and dignified resettlement—prior to project-related impacts like flooding—highlights systemic gaps in administrative accountability and the implementation of social welfare guarantees. The protest underscores a broader, recurring disconnect between major infrastructure development projects and the constitutional and legal mandate to protect the fundamental rights and livelihoods of vulnerable citizens.
An First Information Report was lodged against staff members of the Bihar Chief Minister's Office following the controversial posting of a photograph and identifiable details of a minor student victim from Jamui on the social media platform X. The incident sparked sharp political backlash led by opposition figures who argued that the disclosure constituted a direct violation of Section 23 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and Supreme Court directives regarding the privacy and confidentiality of minor survivors of sexual violence. This development underscores critical questions surrounding digital governance, institutional accountability, and the legal liabilities of state machinery in safeguarding vulnerable populations.