UPSC Civil Services · 2022 · GS 4

Ethical dilemmas and stakeholder reasoning

“Ramesh is State Civil Services Officer who got the opportunity of getting posted to the capital of a border State after rendering 20 years of service. Ramesh’s mother has recently been detected cancer and has been admitted in the leading cancer hospital of the city. His two adolescent children have also got admission in one of the best public schools of the town. After settling down in his appointment as Director in the Home Department of the State, Ramesh got confidential report through intelligence sources that illegal migrants are infiltrating in the State from the neighbouring country. He decided to personally carry out surprise check of the border posts along with his Home Department team. To his surprise, he caught red-handed two families of 12 members infiltrated with the connivance of the security personnel at the border posts. On further inquiry and investigation, it was found that after the migrants from neighbouring country infiltrate, their documentation like Aadhaar Card, Ration Card and Voter Card are also forged and they are made to settle down in a particular area of the State. Ramesh prepared the detailed and comprehensive report and submitted to the Additional Secretary of the State. However, he has summoned by the Additional Home Secretary after a week and was instructed to withdraw the report. The Additional Home Secretary informed Ramesh that the report submitted by him has not been appreciated by the higher authorities. He further cautioned him that if he fails to withdraw the confidential ort, he will not only be posted out from the prestigious appointment from the State capital but his further promotion which is due in near future will also get in jeopardy. (a) What are the options available to Ramesh as the Director of the Home Department of the bordering State? (b) What option should Ramesh adopt and why? (c) Critically evaluate each of the options. (d) What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by Ramesh? (e) What policy measures would you suggest to combat the menace of infiltration of illegal migrants from the neighbouring country?”

Original exam: 20 marks

Official UPSC paper archive ↗

This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.

Brainstorm this paper →

This theme in the news

GS 2 · Governance & social justice

Aaditya Thackeray Seeks Postponement of MPSC State Service Mains Pending V. Radha Committee Report

In September 2026, political leader Aaditya Thackeray urged the Maharashtra government to defer the Maharashtra Public Service Commission State Service Mains examination until the reform committee headed by Additional Chief Secretary V. Radha submits its report and recommendations are implemented. The demand highlights systemic concerns regarding exam scheduling, transparency, and candidate grievances in public service recruitment.

GS 2 · Constitution & polity

Bihar Pushes for Centre-State Coordination to Curb Infiltration Along Nepal Border

Recent administrative directives in Bihar emphasizing enhanced collaboration between central security apparatuses and state machinery to manage the porous India-Nepal border underscore critical challenges in regional internal security. The push to curb illicit cross-border movement, alongside instructions to audit unregistered religious sites, highlights the intricate intersection of federal cooperative frameworks, border management, and local administrative enforcement.

GS 4 · Ethics & integrity

President Murmu Urges Film Personalities Against Endorsing Harmful Health Products at National Film Awards

At the seventy-second National Film Awards ceremony held at Ekta Nagar near the Statue of Unity, President Droupadi Murmu commended the Indian cinema industry for its expansive cultural reach while issuing a sharp caution against endorsing harmful health products. Emphasizing that a true star spreads light rather than darkness, the President highlighted the profound moral and social responsibilities borne by public figures whose commercial choices directly shape public health, impressionable youth, and societal values.