UPSC Civil Services · 2022 · GS 4

Ethical dilemmas and stakeholder reasoning

“You are appointed as an officer heading the section in Environment Pollution Control Board to ensure compliance and its follow-up. In that region, there were large number of small and medium industries which had been granted clearance. You learnt that these industries provide employment to many migrant worker. Most of the industrial units have got environmental clearance certificate in their possession. The environmental clearance seeks to curb industries and projects that supposedly hamper environment and living species in the region, But in practice. most of these units remain to be polluting units in several ways like air, water and soil pollution. As such, local people encountered persistent health problems. It was confirmed that majority of the industries were violating environmental compliance. You issued notice to all the industrial units to apply for fresh environmental clearance certificate from the competent authority. However, your action met with hostile response from a section of the industrial units, other vested interest persons and a section of the local politicians. The workers also became hostile to you as they felt that your action would lead to the closure of these industrial units, and the resultant unemployment will lead to insecurity uncertainty in their livelihood. Many owners of the industries approached you with the plea that you should not initiate harsh action as it would compel them their units, and cause huge financial loss, shortage of their products in the market. These would obviously add to the sufferings of the labourers and the consumers alike. The labour union also sent you representation requesting against the closure of the units. You simultaneously started receiving threats from unknown corners. You however received supports from some of your colleagues, who advised you to act freely to ensure environmental compliance. Local NGOs also came to your support and they demanded the closure of the polluting units immediately. (a) What are the options available to you under the given situation? (b) Critically examine the options listed by you. (c) What type of mechanism would you suggest to ensure environmental compliance? (d) What are the ethical dilemmas you faced in exercising your option?”

Original exam: 20 marks

Official UPSC paper archive ↗

This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.

Brainstorm this paper →

This theme in the news

GS 4 · Ethics & integrity

President Murmu Urges Film Personalities Against Endorsing Harmful Health Products at National Film Awards

At the seventy-second National Film Awards ceremony held at Ekta Nagar near the Statue of Unity, President Droupadi Murmu commended the Indian cinema industry for its expansive cultural reach while issuing a sharp caution against endorsing harmful health products. Emphasizing that a true star spreads light rather than darkness, the President highlighted the profound moral and social responsibilities borne by public figures whose commercial choices directly shape public health, impressionable youth, and societal values.

GS 3 · Environment & disasters

Illegal Excavation of Lake Bed for Party Event: Environmental and Governance Implications

Following the illegal excavation of approximately 45,72,058 cubic feet of sand from a lake bed to level a site for a political function, a criminal case has been registered against Tamil Nadu Minister E.V. Velu and other organizers. This incident, which reportedly resulted in an estimated loss of ₹8.22 crore to the state exchequer, serves as a poignant example of the tension between political event management and the urgent need for environmental preservation. The case raises critical questions regarding the failure of local monitoring mechanisms, the accountability of public figures, and the protection of essential water resources against unauthorized land use.

GS 3 · Environment & disasters

Supreme Court Issues Notice on Plea in Sinking of MSC Elsa 3

In September 2026, the Supreme Court of India, through a Bench led by Justice K.V. Viswanathan, issued a formal notice to Elsa 3 Maritime Inc., the owning company of the vessel MSC Elsa 3, in response to a legal plea concerning its sinking. The judicial intervention highlights pressing concerns regarding maritime safety, environmental restitution, salvage liabilities, and the complex jurisdictional challenges involved in holding foreign-flagged commercial vessel operators accountable for coastal disasters in Indian waters.