Can Civil Society and Non-Governmental Organizations present an alternative model of public service delivery to benefit the common citizen? Discuss the challenges of this alternative model.
This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.
On September 27, 2026, Ashutosh Ranka and a team from the non-governmental organization Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) were detained by authorities in Guwahati, Assam. The incident occurred while the team was purportedly engaged in a fact-finding mission to assess the ground-level conditions of educational institutions in the state. The detention has reignited a critical discourse regarding the operational independence of civil society organizations, the boundaries of state authority in restricting movement, and the perceived antagonism between administrative narratives of development and independent investigative efforts by NGOs.
In September 2026, political leader Aaditya Thackeray urged the Maharashtra government to defer the Maharashtra Public Service Commission State Service Mains examination until the reform committee headed by Additional Chief Secretary V. Radha submits its report and recommendations are implemented. The demand highlights systemic concerns regarding exam scheduling, transparency, and candidate grievances in public service recruitment.
The Tamil Nadu government has issued an executive order exempting its Public (Law and Order) Department from the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005, invoking Section 24 of the legislation. This notification shields sensitive administrative domains—including records related to communal and caste clashes, National Security Act detentions, custodial death inquiries, and protests by students and farmers—from public scrutiny. While state authorities justify the move as a measure to protect operational confidentiality and prevent the misuse of sensitive intelligence, legal experts and civil society groups have raised profound concerns over transparency erosion, executive overreach, and the weakening of institutional accountability in matters concerning fundamental rights and state action.