This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.
The political furore surrounding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar has intensified, with opposition leaders from multiple states, including Kerala, uniting in demands for his resignation. This unprecedented public confrontation stems from sharp internal dissent within the Election Commission of India regarding administrative actions such as the Special Intensive Revision of voter lists and allegations of procedural bias. The controversy underscores deep-seated anxieties regarding the autonomy of India's premier electoral oversight body and its ability to maintain public trust in a polarized political landscape.
In September 2026, Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi raised formal questions regarding electoral roll modifications, centralized control, and decision-making mechanisms within the Election Commission of India. Appointed under the Chief Election Commissioners and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, their public dissent brings to light deep-seated concerns over institutional independence, internal pluralism, and public trust in constitutional bodies amid nationwide controversies involving special intensive revisions of voter lists. This development underscores how structural shifts in appointment laws intersect with daily operational dynamics inside India's premier electoral watchdog.
On September 27, 2026, CPI(M) leader M.A. Baby met with Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Arvind Kejriwal to discuss strategic coordination for the INDIA bloc. The primary agenda of the meeting was to address growing opposition concerns regarding the Election Commission of India (ECI), specifically focusing on the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. Opposition leaders allege that the SIR process is susceptible to manipulation and that the ECI’s perceived lack of institutional neutrality warrants a collective protest. The discussion also covered the broader context of federal friction, including the alleged misuse of Central investigative agencies against opposition-led state governments, particularly in Keralam, framing the ECI's actions within a larger discourse on democratic institutional integrity.