UPSC Civil Services · 2019 · GS 4

Ethical dilemmas and stakeholder reasoning

A big corporate house is engaged in manufacturing industrial chemicals on a large scale. It proposes to set upon the additional unit. Many states rejected its proposal due to the detrimental effect on the environment. But one state government acceded to the request and permitted the unit close to a city, brushing aside all opposition. The unit was set up 10 years ago and was in full swing till recently. The pollution caused by the industrial effluents was affecting the land, water and crops in the area. It was also causing serious health problems to human beings and animals. This gave rise to a series of agitation thousands of people took part, creating a law and order problem necessitating stern police action. Following the public outcry, the State government ordered the closure of the factory. The closure of the factory resulted in the unemployment of not only those workers who were engaged in the factory but also those who were working in the ancillary units. It also very badly ations. When your team reaches the affected area, the people there heckle and even assault some of the team members. One of your team members is even severely injured. Faced with this crisis some team member pleads with you to call off the operations freeing threats to their life. In such trying circumstances, what will be your response? Examine the qualities of a public servant which will be required to manage the situations.

Original exam: 20 marks

Official UPSC paper archive ↗

This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.

Brainstorm this paper →

This theme in the news

GS 1 · Geography

Maharashtra Faces Severe Drought Pinch Affecting Civic and Cultural Life

Recent India Meteorological Department data reveals that 20 out of 36 districts in Maharashtra are grappling with deficient rainfall, plunging large parts of the state into a severe agricultural and domestic water crisis. The unfolding deficit has severely disrupted everyday societal rituals, ranging from community festival idol immersions to municipal water allocations for cremation and funeral rites. As reservoirs deplete across Marathwada and Vidarbha, the crisis highlights structural vulnerabilities in agrarian dependence, erratic monsoon patterns driven by climate change, and the urgent need for robust drought management frameworks that balance ecological limits with public welfare.

GS 4 · Ethics & integrity

President Murmu Urges Film Personalities Against Endorsing Harmful Health Products at National Film Awards

At the seventy-second National Film Awards ceremony held at Ekta Nagar near the Statue of Unity, President Droupadi Murmu commended the Indian cinema industry for its expansive cultural reach while issuing a sharp caution against endorsing harmful health products. Emphasizing that a true star spreads light rather than darkness, the President highlighted the profound moral and social responsibilities borne by public figures whose commercial choices directly shape public health, impressionable youth, and societal values.

GS 2 · Governance & social justice

Tamil Nadu Government Exempts Public Law and Order Department from RTI Act

The Tamil Nadu government has issued an executive order exempting its Public (Law and Order) Department from the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005, invoking Section 24 of the legislation. This notification shields sensitive administrative domains—including records related to communal and caste clashes, National Security Act detentions, custodial death inquiries, and protests by students and farmers—from public scrutiny. While state authorities justify the move as a measure to protect operational confidentiality and prevent the misuse of sensitive intelligence, legal experts and civil society groups have raised profound concerns over transparency erosion, executive overreach, and the weakening of institutional accountability in matters concerning fundamental rights and state action.