Examine the relevance of the following in the context of civil service: (a) Transparency (b) Accountability (c) Fairness and justice (d) Courage of conviction (e) Spirit of service.
This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.
On September 27, 2026, Ashutosh Ranka and a team from the non-governmental organization Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) were detained by authorities in Guwahati, Assam. The incident occurred while the team was purportedly engaged in a fact-finding mission to assess the ground-level conditions of educational institutions in the state. The detention has reignited a critical discourse regarding the operational independence of civil society organizations, the boundaries of state authority in restricting movement, and the perceived antagonism between administrative narratives of development and independent investigative efforts by NGOs.
In September 2026, political leader Aaditya Thackeray urged the Maharashtra government to defer the Maharashtra Public Service Commission State Service Mains examination until the reform committee headed by Additional Chief Secretary V. Radha submits its report and recommendations are implemented. The demand highlights systemic concerns regarding exam scheduling, transparency, and candidate grievances in public service recruitment.
The Supreme Court of India recently issued a revised order concerning the detention of a Delhi University student under the National Security Act (NSA). While the initial order appeared to grant a comprehensive stay on an Allahabad High Court judgment that had quashed the student's detention, the corrected judicial directive clarifies the scope of this intervention. The stay is now restricted exclusively to specific paragraphs of the High Court’s ruling that imposed strictures and a ₹5 lakh penalty on the concerned official, Medha Roopam. Crucially, the substantive relief granted by the High Court—the quashing of the detention order itself—remains intact. This development underscores the judiciary’s ongoing struggle to maintain a delicate equilibrium between state security prerogatives and the protection of fundamental rights, while simultaneously addressing the mechanisms of administrative accountability for errant state action.