Land needed for mining, dams and other largescale projects is acquired mostly from Adivasis, hill dwellers and rural communities. The displaced persons are paid monetary compensation as per the legal provisions. However, the payment is often tardy. In any case, it cannot sustain the displaced families for long. These people do not possess marketable skills to engage in some other occupation. They end up as low paid migrant labourers. Moreover, their living is destroyed. Thus, the benefits of traditional ways of community development go to industries, industrialists and urban communities whereas the costs are passed on to these poor helpless people. This unjust distribution of costs and benefits is unethical. Suppose you have been entrusted with the task of drafting a better compensation-cum-rehabilitation policy for such displaced persons, how would you approach the problem and what would be the main elements of your suggested policy?
This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.
For sixteen days, dam project oustees in Madhya Pradesh have been engaged in ongoing protests, intensified by severe monsoon-induced waterlogging that has inundated their homes and destroyed essential personal property. This situation reflects a critical failure in the rehabilitation of displaced populations, where project-affected persons (PAPs) have been left in precarious conditions during a peak weather event. The failure to secure timely, safe, and dignified resettlement—prior to project-related impacts like flooding—highlights systemic gaps in administrative accountability and the implementation of social welfare guarantees. The protest underscores a broader, recurring disconnect between major infrastructure development projects and the constitutional and legal mandate to protect the fundamental rights and livelihoods of vulnerable citizens.
At the seventy-second National Film Awards ceremony held at Ekta Nagar near the Statue of Unity, President Droupadi Murmu commended the Indian cinema industry for its expansive cultural reach while issuing a sharp caution against endorsing harmful health products. Emphasizing that a true star spreads light rather than darkness, the President highlighted the profound moral and social responsibilities borne by public figures whose commercial choices directly shape public health, impressionable youth, and societal values.