You are recently posted as district development officer of a district. Shortly thereafter you found that there is considerable tension in the rural areas of your district on the issue of sending girls to schools. The elders of the village feel that many problems have come up because girls are being educated and they are stepping out of the safe environment of the household. They are of the view that the girls should be quickly married off with minimum education. The girls are also competing for jobs after education, which have traditionally remained in boys’ exclusive domain, adding to unemployment amongst male population. The younger generation feels that in the present era, girls should have equal opportunities for education and employment, and other means of livelihood. The entire locality is divided between the elders and the younger lot and further sub-divided between sexes in both generations. You come to know that in Panchayat or in other local bodies or even in busy crossroads, the issue is being acrimoniously debated. One day you are informed that an unpleasant incident has taken place. Some girls were molested, when they were en route to schools. The incident led to clashes between several groups and a law and order problem has arisen. The elders after heated discussion have taken a joint decision not to allow girls to go to school and to socially boycott all such families, which do not follow their dictate. 1. What steps would you take to ensure girls’ safety without disrupting their education? 2. How would you manage and mould matriarchic attitude of the village elders to ensure harmony in the inter-generational relations?
This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.
In September 2026, Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary announced that the state will conduct its next round of panchayat elections only after the completion of a fresh delimitation exercise. This decision reflects an administrative effort to redraw panchayat boundaries to better align with current population figures, specifically targeting a threshold of approximately 7,500 individuals per panchayat. While delimitation is a standard technical process meant to improve governance efficiency, it creates a temporary deferment of the electoral cycle. The move underscores the challenge of balancing periodic administrative reforms with the constitutional mandate for timely local body elections.
A major political controversy erupted as the Congress party alleged that several party-backed councillors, who were returning from Himachal Pradesh, were detained in Haryana ahead of crucial local body elections in Rajasthan. This incident brings to the fore the persistent and troubling trend of resort politics, pre-emptive confinement, and cross-state movement of elected representatives designed to insulate them from poaching. Such tactics underscore systemic vulnerabilities within local self-governance, highlighting how intense electoral competition at the grassroots often overrides institutional integrity, political ethics, and democratic norms.
The Kerala High Court recently intervened to protect a CPI(M) member from coercive legal action by state authorities following a social media post that compared media coverage of political leaders foreign trips across different tenures. The petitioner argued that the post constituted a legitimate political observation rather than defamation against the Home Minister. This judicial intervention highlights ongoing tensions surrounding the threshold for criminal defamation, police overreach, and the protection of dissenting or comparative political discourse in democratic spaces.