Rameshwar successfully cleared the prestigious civil services examination and was excited about the opportunity that he would get through the civil services to serve the country. However, soon after joining the services, he realized that things are not as rosy as he had imagined. He found a number of malpractices prevailing in the department assigned to him. For example, funds under various schemes and grants were being misappropriated. The official facilities were frequently being used for personal needs by the officers and staff. After some time, he noticed that the process of recruiting the staff was also not up to the mark. Prospective candidates were required to write an examination in which a lot of cheating was going on. Some candidates were provided external help in the examination. Rameshwar brought these incidents to the notice of his seniors. However, he was advised to keep his eyes, ears and mouth shut and ignore all these things which were taking place with the connivance of the higher-ups. Rameshwar felt highly disillusioned and uncomfortable. He comes to you seeking your advice. Indicate various options that you think are available in this situation. How would you help him to evaluate these options and choose the most appropriate path to be adopted?
This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.
On September 29, 2026, the Calcutta High Court granted interim bail until October 20 to Milan Pradhan, the Congress party candidate for the Nandigram assembly bypoll scheduled for October 5, 2026. Pradhan had been arrested on September 18, 2026, in connection with a criminal case dating back nineteen years. His detention, occurring just days before the commencement of voting, prompted significant allegations of political victimisation and the deliberate misuse of state machinery to impede his electoral campaign. The High Court's intervention, which allows Pradhan to resume his campaign activities, underscores the critical role of the judiciary in ensuring a level playing field during elections and protecting the democratic right of candidates to participate in the electoral process, especially when the timing of law enforcement actions raises concerns about the integrity of the polling environment.
The Supreme Court of India recently issued a revised order concerning the detention of a Delhi University student under the National Security Act (NSA). While the initial order appeared to grant a comprehensive stay on an Allahabad High Court judgment that had quashed the student's detention, the corrected judicial directive clarifies the scope of this intervention. The stay is now restricted exclusively to specific paragraphs of the High Court’s ruling that imposed strictures and a ₹5 lakh penalty on the concerned official, Medha Roopam. Crucially, the substantive relief granted by the High Court—the quashing of the detention order itself—remains intact. This development underscores the judiciary’s ongoing struggle to maintain a delicate equilibrium between state security prerogatives and the protection of fundamental rights, while simultaneously addressing the mechanisms of administrative accountability for errant state action.
At the seventy-second National Film Awards ceremony held at Ekta Nagar near the Statue of Unity, President Droupadi Murmu commended the Indian cinema industry for its expansive cultural reach while issuing a sharp caution against endorsing harmful health products. Emphasizing that a true star spreads light rather than darkness, the President highlighted the profound moral and social responsibilities borne by public figures whose commercial choices directly shape public health, impressionable youth, and societal values.