UPSC Civil Services · 2014 · GS 2

Union Executive

Instances of President’s delay in commuting death sentences has come under public debate as denial of justice. Should there be a time limit specified for the President to accept/reject such petitions? Analyse.

Original exam: 12.5 marks

Official UPSC paper archive ↗

This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.

Brainstorm this paper →

This theme in the news

GS 2 · Constitution & polity

Tirupattur TVK MLA's Single-Vote Victory Upheld: Madras High Court Rejects Election Petition

The Madras High Court recently dismissed an election petition challenging the remarkably narrow single-vote victory of Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) MLA R. Seenivasa Sethupathy from Tirupattur, which was filed by former minister K.R. Periakaruppan. The ruling underscores the stringent statutory thresholds required under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, to overturn certified electoral outcomes, highlighting the delicate balance courts must maintain between addressing electoral grievances and respecting popular democratic mandates.

GS 2 · Governance & social justice

Jalpaiguri Court Death Sentence and State Care Directive for Convict's Children

In September 2026, the Additional Sessions Judge of Jalpaiguri, West Bengal, sentenced a man to death while issuing a landmark directive requiring the district administration to secure the education, physical, and psychological well-being of the convict's two minor sons. Emphasizing that the sins of a parent must not penalize innocent children, the ruling underscores the constitutional doctrine of parens patriae and the state's positive obligation to shield vulnerable minors from collateral destitution arising from criminal proceedings.

GS 2 · Constitution & polity

Citizens for Justice and Peace and the Debate on ECI Institutional Reforms

On September 24, 2026, the organization Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) announced a significant shift in its operational schedule, cancelling previously planned programs to address the escalating concerns surrounding the Election Commission of India (ECI). The organization announced a press conference in New Delhi titled "Hijacking of India's Democracy," which centers on the functioning of the ECI and specific scrutiny regarding Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar. This development reflects growing civil society apprehension regarding the perceived erosion of institutional independence and the need for administrative transparency within India's premier electoral management body. As the nation prepares for future electoral cycles, the focus has increasingly turned toward the autonomy of constitutional institutions and the mechanisms by which they are held accountable.