Do government’s schemes for up-lifting vulnerable and backward communities by protecting required social resources for them, lead to their exclusion in establishing businesses in urban economics?
This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.
In September 2026, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay announced the 'Thaimaman Thanga Mothiram Thittam', a state-sponsored welfare scheme providing a one-gram gold ring to new mothers. Designed to acknowledge the contribution of mothers and symbolically represent the support of a maternal uncle (Thaimaman), the scheme aims to serve as a catalyst for improving postnatal care, institutional delivery rates, and government-citizen engagement in the public health sector. The initiative continues the state's tradition of utilizing tangible welfare assets to bolster health outcomes while fostering strong grassroots political support.
In September 2026, the Tamil Nadu government intensified its commitment to gender-inclusive economic development by scaling up support for women-headed enterprises through the Vetri Magalir Thozhilmunaivor Membattu Thittam. Implemented via the Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation (TIIC), the initiative provides substantial financial backing with loans ranging from ₹10 lakh to ₹5 crore. Designed to address structural barriers in credit access, the scheme seeks to transition women entrepreneurs from micro-ventures to competitive industrial enterprises, bolstering regional manufacturing and inclusive employment.
For sixteen days, dam project oustees in Madhya Pradesh have been engaged in ongoing protests, intensified by severe monsoon-induced waterlogging that has inundated their homes and destroyed essential personal property. This situation reflects a critical failure in the rehabilitation of displaced populations, where project-affected persons (PAPs) have been left in precarious conditions during a peak weather event. The failure to secure timely, safe, and dignified resettlement—prior to project-related impacts like flooding—highlights systemic gaps in administrative accountability and the implementation of social welfare guarantees. The protest underscores a broader, recurring disconnect between major infrastructure development projects and the constitutional and legal mandate to protect the fundamental rights and livelihoods of vulnerable citizens.