You are the Executive Director of an upcoming InfoTech Company which is making a name for itself in the market. Mr. A, who is a star performer, is heading the marketing team. In a short period of one year, he has helped in doubling the revenues as well as creating a high brand equity for the Company so much so that you are thinking of promoting him. However, you have been receiving information from many corners about his attitude towards the female colleagues; particularly his habit of making loose comments on women. In addition, he regularly sends indecent SMS’s to all the team members including his female colleagues. One day, late in the evening, Mrs. X, who is one of Mr. A’s team members, comes to you visibly disturbed. She complains against the continued misconduct of Mr. A, who has been making undesirable advances towards her and has even tried to touch her inappropriately in his cabin. She tenders her resignation and leaves your office. 1. What are the options available to you? 2. Evaluate each of these options and choose the option you would adopt, giving reasons.”
This question is available to read here. The practice button generates a fresh question from the same paper. Here, practise an answer plan in keywords. Choose your timer on the next screen. Feedback uses our common 15-point practice rubric, rather than the paper’s original mark allocation.
At the seventy-second National Film Awards ceremony held at Ekta Nagar near the Statue of Unity, President Droupadi Murmu commended the Indian cinema industry for its expansive cultural reach while issuing a sharp caution against endorsing harmful health products. Emphasizing that a true star spreads light rather than darkness, the President highlighted the profound moral and social responsibilities borne by public figures whose commercial choices directly shape public health, impressionable youth, and societal values.
A Delhi court has issued formal notice on an appeal filed by prominent women wrestlers challenging the acquittal of former Wrestling Federation of India president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and former official Vinod Tomar. This high-profile legal development reopens judicial scrutiny into allegations of sexual harassment and intimidation within Indian sports administration, highlighting systemic challenges in accountability, workplace safety, and justice delivery for elite athletes.
The Madras High Court recently dismissed a writ petition filed by AIADMK whip Agri S.S. Krishnamurthy challenging an amendment to a Tamil Nadu Assembly resolution regarding the Mekedatu project. The bench, comprising Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan, rejected the plea to quash the amendment, which seeks the constitution of a tribunal to resolve the contentious water-sharing dispute between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, highlighting the legal and federal dimensions of river governance.