GS 2 · Rights, duties and constitutional morality
Published · Updated
The Supreme Court has issued notice on a plea filed by Pranit More seeking to club multiple First Information Reports registered across different states, notably Maharashtra and Haryana, in connection with the viral '₹370 biriyani' controversy. A three-judge Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India sought responses from the Union government and the respective state authorities. This case highlights recurring legal debates surrounding the multiplicity of proceedings, forum shopping, and the protection of fundamental freedoms against retaliatory or harassing criminal prosecutions.
WHY THIS MATTERS FOR MAINS
Explicitly examine the judicial trend of clubbing multiple FIRs arising from the same cause of action to protect personal liberty and prevent misuse of criminal law across jurisdictions. Implicitly evaluate the tension between federal state police powers and Supreme Court's protective writ jurisdiction.
Study angle, not an exam prediction · GS 2 / Constitution & polity
TRY THE DEMAND · ORIGINAL PRACTICE PROMPT
Generate a fresh timed question on this syllabus topic and build your own answer plan.
Practice this topic →News facts are drawn from these reports. The Mains analysis is our study interpretation.
UPSC 2025 · GS 2
“Constitutional morality is the fulcrum which acts as an essential check upon the high functionaries and citizens alike...” In view of the above observation of the Supreme Court, explain the concept of constitutional morality and its application to ensure balance between judicial independence and judicial accountability in India.
Read this PYQ →UPSC 2021 · GS 2
‘Constitutional Morality’ is rooted in the Constitution itself and is founded on its essential facets. Explain the doctrine of ‘Constitutional Morality’ with the help of relevant judicial decisions.
Read this PYQ →UPSC 2024 · GS 2
Right to privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty and is inherently protected under Article 21 of the Constitution. Explain. In this reference discuss the law relating to D.N.A. testing of a child in the womb to establish its paternity.
Read this PYQ →UPSC 2023 · GS 2
”The Constitution of India is a living instrument with capabilities of enormous dynamism. It is a constitution made for a progressive society”. Illustrate with special reference to the expanding horizons of the right to life and personal liberty.
Read this PYQ →GS 2 · Constitution & polity
In a significant legal intervention addressing the statutory protections of gender minorities, the Supreme Court asserted that subsequent amendments or alterations to transgender laws cannot strip away rights and identity recognitions already conferred upon individuals. Responding to petitions urging protection against the arbitrary cancellation of transgender identity cards, the apex court reinforced the doctrine of non-retrogression, emphasizing that state actions must uphold dignity, legal certainty, and fundamental constitutional guarantees established under landmark jurisprudence.
GS 2 · Constitution & polity
On September 27, 2026, the Supreme Court engaged in crucial hearings regarding legal challenges to the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019. In a notable divergence of administrative stances, the Andhra Pradesh government submitted an affidavit stating it played no role in the enactment of the central legislation and maintained that it has not engaged in any discriminatory practices against transgender persons. Conversely, the Uttarakhand government defended the Act, asserting that the existing framework is beneficial for the community and sufficient to address their welfare needs. This judicial discourse highlights the complex interplay between central legislative mandates, state-level implementation, and the overarching constitutional protections for vulnerable groups.
GS 2 · Constitution & polity
On September 22, 2026, the Kerala High Court granted bail to the Managing Director of Reporter TV, Anto Augustine, in relation to a case concerning the alleged possession of alcohol. The decision, delivered by Justice Kauser Edappagath, followed an appeal filed by the petitioner against an order previously passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate at Sulthan Bathery. This legal development highlights the critical role of appellate courts in reviewing lower court directives, particularly in matters involving individual liberty and procedural adherence. The ruling underscores the judiciary's responsibility to balance investigative requirements with the fundamental rights of individuals, serving as a reminder of the established constitutional principles governing detention and the grant of bail in the Indian legal system.